Egyptian Politician: We Need FGM To Lower Female Libido





 

1 2 5
What Is The Chinese
Secret To Optimum
Blood Pressure?
Why This Is The
Healthiest Oil On Earth?
Click To Learn More
100% of Your
Vital Nutrition In
Just 30 Seconds

A member of Egyptian parliament called on women to agree to female genital mutilation, or FGM, in order to “reduce their sexual appetites,” local media reported. He also allegedly cited Egyptian men’s high rate of consumption of sexual stimulants…

Read More At:

Clip from The Kyle Kulinski Show, which airs live on Blog Talk Radio and Secular Talk Radio Monday – Friday 11:00 AM – 12:30 PM Eastern time zone.

Check out our website – and become a member – at:

Listen to the Live Show or On Demand archive at:

Follow on Twitter:

Like on Facebook:

Friends Of SecularTalk:

AMAZON LINK:

Egyptian Politician: We Need FGM To Lower Female Libido

A member of Egyptian parliament called on women to agree to female genital mutilation, or FGM, in order to “reduce their sexual appetites,” local media reported. He also allegedly cited Egyptian men’s high rate of consumption of sexual stimulants...

Read More At:
https://www.rt.com/news/358199-female-genital-mutilation-egypt/




Clip from The Kyle Kulinski Show, which airs live on Blog Talk Radio and Secular Talk Radio Monday - Friday 11:00 AM - 12:30 PM Eastern time zone.

Check out our website - and become a member - at:
http://www.SecularTalkRadio.com

Listen to the Live Show or On Demand archive at:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kylekulinski

Follow on Twitter:
http://www.twitter.com/kylekulinski

Like on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/SecularTalk

Friends Of SecularTalk:
http://www.facebook.com/beastofreason

AMAZON LINK:
http://www.amazon.com/?tag=seculacom-20

56 thoughts on “Egyptian Politician: We Need FGM To Lower Female Libido

    1. Why, of course. It’s the same logic they use to justify that women need to cover up or need to stay at home without their husband or a male family member as an escort. It is only to to protect them from men. Because men have so little self controll, they rape every women they see if she isn’t covered up or has a body guard.
      What else would you do?
      Punish the men? Ridiculous.
      Look at the facts, the science? Blasphemy.

      But seriously, if there is one thing religion is good at, it’s turning things completely on their head, including logic.

    2. +ponykisses bolby (John smith) Egyptians man aren’t naturally weak the government had a project aimed at lowering population growth . by using drugs to MASSIVELY lower man sexual capabilities . and this ruined it for both sides . and after they failed to lower the growth enough thanks to man using viagra 24/7 . they are now targeting the women . not because they are sexist but because they are fools running a country with big issues

    3. +The Lusty Empress and her quartette of fools this only applies to saudi arabia ,in the rest women arent forced to wear anything they CHOOSE to do so

  1. Drives me crazy, people like these. Fucking savages. Grrr. I’m circumcised, but I did it willingly as an adult due to a medical condition known as phimosis. So circumcision is a good procedure, but should never be imposed on anyone. FGM is just a barbaric act that does no good whatsoever.

    1. It’s not just a price of skin it’s the most sensitive part of a males body. Regardless mgm should not be performed without someone’s consent.

    2. Even if it’s not rooted in it, religion is helping to preserve it because there is value in it due to religion. I’ll remove the word if it bothers you so much. Happy?

    3. +alex ponomarenko I’m not medically trained, but I highly doubt the foreskin is the most sensitive part. I think without the glans you wouldn’t feel anything. And like I said, I feel more now due to removing the foreskin. At any rate, I agree that removing the foreskin shouldn’t be forced on anyone and done only if you have a medical reason to do it.

  2. Jee its a good thing we dont cut off parts of people’s genitals here in America. Because that would be completely hypocritical. Good thing we dont right? Oh wait…. we mutilate millions of baby boy’s genitals every year? Oh well! America is by default always right and anything is okay when we do it and only when we do it. Because you know, equal rights, except when it comes to mutilating baby’s genitals, then who cares! Yay! Its not like our doctors make billions of dollars of profit off of performing an unecessary and immoral surgery… oh wait they do? Neat! USA! USA! USA!

    We are just as fucking dumb as any other country. The only difference is we are us. And therefor its okay.

    1. Yeah Kyle talked about this in the video but FGM is a bit worse. At least circumcised men still have feeling. It would be like if they removed the head of your penis.

    2. +mayrana2 Female Genital Mutilation is, by definition, the removal of any amount of tissue from the genitals. It varies from removing the clitoris to trimming the labia, or both. Causing a small puncture to the labia is considered FGM and is illegal by law. Where as cutting off any undetermined amount of functioning, nerve-rich, vascular tissue is by definition less bad? How so? The foreskin isnt even just skin. Its just American doctors are never taught what it is. It consists of a double layer of inverted skin, an adult foreskin covers 15 square inches. It has between 10000 and 20 000 fine touch nerve endings (the clitoris has 8000), it has stretch receptors, mucosal membrane, mucosal junction, a ridged band, and a frenulum. The large blood vessels at the base of the penis travel all the way out to the very end of the foreskin. They supply all the nerve endings. When you cut it off you are literally severing arteries in the penis and killing thousands of nerves. So right off the bat you are decreasing sensitivity and size of the penis. Plus you are removing the delicate covering that protects the head of the penis, which in turn makes that less sensitive and causes keritanization. So potentially you are losing over 50% of your sensitivity. Thats pretty fucking significant if you ask me.

    3. not only that but over 100 baby boys die each year during the procedure from shock, blood loss etc. and that is in the US alone, one of the most “advanced” nations in the world. the figure I gave doesn’t even account for deaths that arise later on (post-procedure) from other complications such as infections etc. now consider the other billion+ religious people living in underdeveloped nations and try picturing the total death toll of boys forced to suffer through this crap.
      let’s end MGM in North America

    1. this is where the feminists need to be fighting, this is where they need to be screaming “men need to be taught not to rape”, not “theres no women in BF1 *triggered*”, lol

  3. Both male circumcision and female genital mutilation should be categorically banned, FGM is much worse because its intent is literally to destroy sexual pleasure for the woman and it successfully does so. Male circumcision doesn’t do that.

    1. When introduced as a more widespread practice in the United States, the intent of genital mutilation (which, for females, included fucking acid!) was to curb masturbation by making it painful. When performed as expected, males typically retain sexual function, but certainly not as intricately as with the full form and function of natural genitalia. Likewise, women can retain sexual stimulus from certain procedures, but the capacities for desensitization are much more extensive.

  4. I don’t think of male circumcision as being much like female genital mutilation.

    In fact, I used to believe that FGM was not as bad as it really is.

    Why did I think such a horrible thing?

    Well, I thought that FGM was the female equivalent of circumcision.

    Male circumcision is a thing that, while not necessary, isn’t harmful.

    Female genital mutilation is guaranteed to ruin a woman’s sex life. It should be not only illegal, but also something that is
    punished to the fullest extent of the law.

    That is all.

    1. +TheRiiiight You may be right. In many ways, my focus has been more towards the more severe forms of FGM.

      For the record, I don’t think circumcision is a good thing. Then again, I don’t think of it as a bad thing either right now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *